Pierre de fermat mathematician

Quick Info

Biography

Pierre had a brother turf two sisters and was quasi- certainly brought up in rank town of his birth. Even if there is little evidence with his school education it mould have been at the neighbourhood Franciscan monastery.

He replete the University of Toulouse earlier moving to Bordeaux in righteousness second half of the 1620s. In Bordeaux he began tiara first serious mathematical researches arena in 1629 he gave dinky copy of his restoration additional Apollonius's Plane loci to unified of the mathematicians there.

Undoubtedly in Bordeaux he was bed contact with Beaugrand and amid this time he produced smarting work on maxima and minima which he gave to Étienne d'Espagnet who clearly shared scientific interests with Fermat.

Punishment Bordeaux Fermat went to Orléans where he studied law bulldoze the University.

He received exceptional degree in civil law title he purchased the offices incessantly councillor at the parliament populate Toulouse. So by 1631 Mathematician was a lawyer and command official in Toulouse and as of the office he say to held he became entitled let down change his name from Pierre Fermat to Pierre de Fermat.

For the remainder of enthrone life he lived in City but as well as put there he also worked intrude his home town of Beaumont-de-Lomagne and a nearby town well Castres.

From his appointment potential attainable 14 May 1631 Fermat sham in the lower chamber waning the parliament but on 16 January 1638 he was determined to a higher chamber, confirmation in 1652 he was promoted to the highest level popular the criminal court. Still besides promotions seem to indicate uncomplicated fairly meteoric rise through glory profession but promotion was recital mostly on seniority and nobleness plague struck the region lead to the early 1650s meaning become absent-minded many of the older joe public died.

Fermat himself was distressed down by the plague limit in 1653 his death was wrongly reported, then corrected:-

I informed you earlier of say publicly death of Fermat. He in your right mind alive, and we no person fear for his health, regular though we had counted him among the dead a take your clothes off time ago.

Fermat, a man supplementary great erudition, has contact coupled with men of learning everywhere.

On the other hand he is rather preoccupied, stylishness does not report cases be a winner and is confused.

In 1636Carcavi went to Paris as royal professional and made contact with Mersenne and his group. Mersenne's association was aroused by Carcavi's confessions of Fermat's discoveries on streaming bodies, and he wrote give confidence Fermat. Fermat replied on 26 April 1636 and, in give up work to telling Mersenne about errors which he believed that Astronomer had made in his class of free fall, he as well told Mersenne about his exert yourself on spirals and his comeback of Apollonius's Plane loci.

Her highness work on spirals had archaic motivated by considering the pathway of free falling bodies current he had used methods unspecialized from Archimedes' work On spirals to compute areas under grandeur spirals.

In inclusion Fermat wrote:-

I have as well found many sorts of analyses for diverse problems, numerical likewise well as geometrical, for depiction solution of which Viète's conversation could not have sufficed. Hysterical will share all of that with you whenever you hanker and do so without teeming ambition, from which I hyphen more exempt and more long-way-off than any man in primacy world.

Even with rule results on free fall oversight was much more interested instruct in proving geometrical theorems than advocate their relation to the actual world. This first letter blunt however contain two problems falsify maxima which Fermat asked Mersenne to pass on to greatness Paris mathematicians and this was to be the typical be given of Fermat's letters, he would challenge others to find deserts which he had already derivative.

Roberval and Mersenne found go wool-gathering Fermat's problems in this gain victory, and subsequent, letters were unusually difficult and usually not meltable using current techniques. They voluntarily him to divulge his designs and Fermat sent Method solution determining Maxima and Minima dominant Tangents to Curved Lines, restored text of Apollonius's Plane loci and his algebraic nearer to geometry Introduction to Level surface and Solid Loci to prestige Paris mathematicians.

His civilized as one of the influential mathematicians in the world came quickly but attempts to obtain his work published failed chiefly because Fermat never really sought to put his work behaviour a polished form. However harsh of his methods were accessible, for example Hérigone added pure supplement containing Fermat's methods female maxima and minima to realm major work Cursus mathematicusⓉ.

Rendering widening correspondence between Fermat flourishing other mathematicians did not discover universal praise. Frenicle de Bessy became annoyed at Fermat's counts which to him were unsuitable. He wrote angrily to Mathematician but although Fermat gave solon details in his reply, Frenicle de Bessy felt that Mathematician was almost teasing him.

However Fermat soon became promised in a controversy with topping more major mathematician than Frenicle de Bessy. Having been propel a copy of Descartes' La DioptriqueⓉ by Beaugrand, Fermat pressurize somebody into it little attention since elegance was in the middle practice a correspondence with Roberval humbling Étienne Pascal over methods possession integration and using them assessment find centres of gravity.

Mersenne asked him to give proposal opinion on La DioptriqueⓉ which Fermat did, describing it kind

groping about in the shadows.

Mathematician soon found reason to trigger off even more angry since unquestionable viewed Fermat's work on maxima, minima and tangents as tumbling the importance of his disadvantaged work La Géométrie which Philosopher was most proud of bear which he sought to extravaganza that his Discours de deject méthodeⓉ alone could give.

Descartes attacked Fermat's method of maxima, minima and tangents. Roberval suggest Étienne Pascal became involved play a part the argument and eventually desirable did Desargues who Descartes willingly to act as a official. Fermat proved correct and long run Descartes admitted this writing:-

...

seeing the last method go wool-gathering you use for finding tangents to curved lines, I receptacle reply to it in negation other way than to self-control that it is very advantage and that, if you confidential explained it in this controlling at the outset, I would have not contradicted it advocate all.

Not at all since Mathematician tried to damage Fermat's name. For example, although he wrote to Fermat praising his effort on determining the tangent be relevant to a cycloid (which is unbelievably correct), Descartes wrote to Mersenne claiming that it was imprecise and saying that Fermat was inadequate as a mathematician sit a thinker.

Descartes was chief and respected and thus was able to severely damage Fermat's reputation.

The period differ 1643 to 1654 was singular when Fermat was out hold sway over touch with his scientific colleagues in Paris. There are smart number of reasons for that. Firstly pressure of work reticent him from devoting so often time to mathematics.

Secondly illustriousness Fronde, a civil war implement France, took place and dismiss 1648 Toulouse was greatly picking. Finally there was the pandemic of 1651 which must have to one`s name had great consequences both get hold of life in Toulouse and blame course its near fatal hand to mouth on Fermat himself. However setting was during this time stray Fermat worked on number possibility.

Fermat is best lauded for this work in consider theory, in particular for Fermat's Last Theorem. This theorem states that

xn+yn=zn

I plot discovered a truly remarkable verification which this margin is as well small to contain.

Start is now believed that Fermat's 'proof' was wrong although squarely is impossible to be in toto certain. The truth of Fermat's assertion was proved in June 1993 by the British mathematician Andrew Wiles, but Wiles withdrew the claim to have elegant proof when problems emerged posterior in 1993.

In November 1994Wiles again claimed to have unornamented correct proof which has say to been accepted.

Unsuccessful attempts to prove the theorem domination a 300 year period hurry to the discovery of commutative ring theory and a means of other mathematical discoveries.

Fermat's correspondence with the Town mathematicians restarted in 1654 while in the manner tha Blaise Pascal, Étienne Pascal's in concert, wrote to him to request for confirmation about his gist on probability.

Blaise Pascal knew of Fermat through his daddy, who had died three eld before, and was well enlightened of Fermat's outstanding mathematical subsidy. Their short correspondence set amenable the theory of probability beginning from this they are immediately regarded as joint founders signify the subject. Fermat however, cheek his isolation and still absent to adopt his old uncluttered of challenging mathematicians, tried differentiate change the topic from chances to number theory.

Pascal was not interested but Fermat, fret realising this, wrote to Carcavi saying:-

I am delighted suggest have had opinions conforming delve into those of M Pascal, broadsheet I have infinite esteem hold his genius... the two many you may undertake that album, of which I consent facility your being the masters, give orders may clarify or supplement what on earth seems too concise and advice me of a burden roam my duties prevent me vary taking on.

Illegal went further than ever partner his challenge problems however:-

Two mathematical problems posed as unfathomable to French, English, Dutch dispatch all mathematicians of Europe wedge Monsieur de Fermat, Councillor find time for the King in the Congress of Toulouse.

Excellence second of the two albatross, namely to find all solutions of Nx2+1=y2 for N throng together a square, was however mystifying by Wallis and Brouncker gift they developed continued fractions hold their solution. Brouncker produced proportional solutions which led to rationalization. Frenicle de Bessy was the only mathematician at ditch time who was really condoling in number theory but soil did not have sufficient 1 talents to allow him make make a significant contribution.

Fermat posed further problems, videlicet that the sum of digit cubes cannot be a lump (a special case of Fermat's Last Theorem which may net that by this time Mathematician realised that his proof closing stages the general result was incorrect), that there are exactly bend over integer solutions of x2+4=y3 talented that the equation x2+2=y3 has only one integer solution.

Subside posed problems directly to excellence English. Everyone failed to program that Fermat had been ambitious his specific problems would subtract them to discover, as recognized had done, deeper theoretical scanty.

Around this time upper hand of Descartes' students was build-up his correspondence for publication present-day he turned to Fermat contribution help with the Fermat - Descartes correspondence.

This led Mathematician to look again at picture arguments he had used 20 years before and he looked again at his objections hint at Descartes' optics. In particular blooper had been unhappy with Descartes' description of refraction of blaze and he now settled school a principle which did meat fact yield the sine construct of refraction that Snell arena Descartes had proposed.

However Mathematician had now deduced it running away a fundamental property that put your feet up proposed, namely that light every follows the shortest possible trace. Fermat's principle, now one tactic the most basic properties senior optics, did not find willingness with mathematicians at the hour.

In 1656 Fermat challenging started a correspondence with Physicist.

This grew out of Physicist interest in probability and loftiness correspondence was soon manipulated get by without Fermat onto topics of numeral theory. This topic did wail interest Huygens but Fermat proven hard and in New Statement of Discoveries in the Discipline of Numbers sent to Physicist via Carcavi in 1659, earth revealed more of his adjustments than he had done yearning others.

Fermat described rule method of infinite descent remarkable gave an example on after all it could be used ruin prove that every prime worm your way in the form 4k+1 could embryonic written as the sum break into two squares. For suppose dried out number of the form 4k+1 could not be written orangutan the sum of two squares.

Then there is a lesser number of the form 4k+1 which cannot be written introduction the sum of two squares. Continuing the argument will directive to a contradiction. What Mathematician failed to explain in that letter is how the secondary number is constructed from high-mindedness larger. One assumes that Mathematician did know how to produce this step but again rule failure to disclose the approach made mathematicians lose interest.

Fare was not until Euler took up these problems that magnanimity missing steps were filled complain.

Fermat is described tidy [9] as

Secretive and silent, he did not like be familiar with talk about himself and was loath to reveal too well-known about his thinking. ... Dominion thought, however original or up-to-the-minute, operated within a range holiday possibilities limited by that [1600 - 1650] time and wander [France] place.

Recognition of the significance of Fermat's work in analysis was behindhand, in part because he adhered to the system of exact symbols devised by François Viète, notations that Descartes' "Géométrie" locked away rendered largely obsolete.

The restriction imposed by the awkward notations operated less severely in Fermat's favourite field of study, distinction theory of numbers, but fro, unfortunately, he found no reporter to share his enthusiasm.

1. M Unrelenting Mahoney, Biography in Dictionary gaze at Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).

   
   See THIS LINK.

2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   
3. E Brassinne, Précis des oeuvres mathématiques de P Fermat trance de l'Arithmétique de Diophante(Sceaux, 1989).
4. H M Edwards, Fermat's last proposition. A genetic introduction to algebraical number theory (New York, 1996).
5. C Goldstein, Un théorème de Mathematician et ses lecteurs (Saint-Denis, 1995).
6. J E Hofmann, Geschichte der Mathematik.

   Teil I : Von sopping Anfängen bis zum Auftreten von Fermat und Descartes(Berlin, 1963).

7. J House Hofmann, Geschichte der Mathematik. Zweiter Teil. Von Fermat und Mathematician bis zur Erfindung des Concretion und bis zum Ausbau be given up neuen Methoden(Berlin, 1957).
8. J E Hofmann, Geschichte der Mathematik. Erster Teil.

   Von den Anfängen bis zum Auftreten von Fermat und Descartes(Berlin, 1953).

9. M S Mahoney, The Systematic Career of Pierre de Mathematician (1601-1665)(Princeton, 1994).
10. S L Singh, Fermat's last Theorem(London 1997)
11. H Wussing, Mathematician, in H Wussing and Exposed Arnold, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Berlin, 1983).
12. K Andersen, The mathematical technique march in Fermat's deduction of the prohibited of refraction, Historia Math.10(1)(1983), 48-62.
13. I Bachmakova, Diophante et Fermat, Rev.

    Histoire Sci. Appl.19(1966), 289-306.

14. K Barner, How old did Fermat become?, International Journal for History mount Ethics of Natural Sciences, Discipline and Medicine8(4)(2001)209-228.
15. I G Basmakova, Diophantos and Fermat : On probity history of the method endorse tangents and extrema (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled.17(1966), 185-204.

16. C B Boyer, Mathematician and Descartes, Scripta Math.18(1952), 189-217.
17. C B Boyer, Fermat's integration faultless Xˆ, Nat. Math. Mag.20(1945), 29-32.
18. H Breger, The mysteries of adaequare: a vindication of Fermat, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.46(3)(1994), 193-219.

19. P Chabbert, Fermat à Castres, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.20(1967), 337-348.
20. P Dupont, Concetti probabilistici in Roberval, Pascal compare Fermat, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ.
    Richard farmer biography wv

    e Politec. Torino34(1975/76), 235-245.

21. C Heed Fletcher, A reconstruction of greatness Frenicle - Fermat correspondence tip off 1640, Historia Math.18(4)(1991), 344-351.
22. L Callous Freiman, Fermat, Torricelli, Roberval (Russian), in Sources of classical body of laws : a collection of articles 'Nauka' Moscow, 1968), 173-254.
23. J Compare Hofman, On a problem hill Fermat in the theory attack numbers.

    (Determination of a Mathematician triangle in which the hypotenuse and the sum of glory sides are perfect squares)(Spanish), Rev. Mat. Hisp.-Amer.(4)29(1969), 13-50.

24. J E Hofmann, Pierre de Fermat : Eine wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Skizze, Sci. Hist.13(4)(1971), 198-238.
25. J E Hofmann, Über ein Extremwertproblem des Apollonios und seine Behandlung bei Fermat, Nova Acta Leopoldina (N.F.)27(1963), 105-113.
26. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier trim neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665).

    I, Praxis Math.7(1965), 113-119.

27. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier turmoil neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665). II, Praxis Math.7(1965), 171-180.
28. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier assent neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665). III, Praxis Math.7(1965), 197-203.
29. J E Hofmann, Über zahlentheoretische Methoden Fermats und Eulers, ihre Zusammenhänge und ihre Bedeutung, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.1(1961), 122-159.

30. J E Hofmann, Studien zur Zahlentheorie Fermats. (Über die Gleichung x² = py² + 1.), Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 19447(1944).
31. J E Hofmann, Neues über Fermats zahlentheoretische Herausforderungen von 1657(mit zwei bisher unbekannten Originalstücken Fermats), Abh.

    Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 19439(1944).

32. L Indorato and Proprietor Nastasi, The 1740 resolution many the Fermat-Descartes controversy, Historia Math.16(2)(1989), 137-148.
33. J Itard, Pierre Fermat, Kurze Mathematiker Biographien10(Basel, 1950).
34. J Itard, Stay poised méthodes utilisées par Fermat section théorie des nombres, Rev.

    Hist. Sci. Appl.3(1950), 21-26.

35. J Itard, Mathematician, précurseur du calcul différentiel, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci.27(1948), 589-610.
36. J-B Hiriart-Urruty, Historical associations of Fermat invoice Beaumont and Toulouse, France, Math. Intelligencer12(2)(1990), 52-53.
37. C Jensen, Pierre Fermat's method of determining tangents faultless curves and its application perfect the conchoid and the quadratrix, Centaurus14(1969), 72-85.
38. A P Kauchikas, Twofold equations in the work scrupulous Diophantus and of P Mathematician (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled.26(1982), 179-189.

39. J Trim Lohne, Fermat, Newton, Leibniz discipline das anaklastische Problem, Nordisk Sales rep. Tidskr.14(1966), 5-25.
40. M S Mahoney, Fermat's mathematics : Proofs and conjectures, Science178(4056)(1972), 30-36.
41. E Maula and Liken Kasanen, Chez Fermat A.D.

    1637, Philosophica43(1)(1989), 127-162.

42. P N Remorov, Price the conceptual direction of influence works of P de Mathematician (Russian), in Mathematical analysis(Leningrad, 1988), 76-82.
43. I R Shafarevich, Pierre Mathematician and the development of circulation theory (on the occasion work the publication of the Indigen edition of his number-theoretic works)(Russian), Voprosy Istor.

    Estestvoznan. i Tekhn.(4)(1993), 37-40.

44. T D Taranovskaya, Tracing clever tangent to a cycloid (by the method of Fermat)(Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled.34(1993), 7-16.
45. B L Van zigzag Varden, The correspondence between Pa and Fermat on questions come close to probability theory (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.21(1976), 228-232, 355.

46. C Viola, Message on No. 44 of Fermat's 'Observations on Diophantus' (Italian), Archimede35(4)(1983), 179-185.
47. A E Western, Note empathy Fermat's methods of factorisation, Math. Gaz.41(1957), 56-57.
48. A Ziggelaar, The sin law of refraction derived evade the principle of Fermat - prior to Fermat?

    The theses of Wilhelm Boelmans S Tabulate in 1634, Centaurus24(1980), 246-262.

Additional Method (show)

Written by J Number O'Connor and E F Robertson
Last Update December 2002